How many times has [2000] RPC 906 been cited?

[2000] RPC 906 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2000] RPC 906

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2000] RPC 906

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Industrial Cleaning Equipment (Southampton) Limited v Intelligent Cleaning Equipment Holdings Co Ltd & Anor 2023-12-06
“…tled to register the mark, in the case of BB on the ground of honest concurrent use within section 12(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1938: see BUDWEISER Trade Marks [2000] RPC 906. Both marks were entered on the register on the same day, 19 May 2000.…”
Cited — Match Group, LLC & Ors. v Muzmatch Limited & Anor. 2023-04-27
“…es were entitled to register the mark, in the case of BB on the ground of honest concurrent use within section 12(2) of the 1938 Act: see BUDWEISER Trade Marks [2000] RPC 906. Both marks were entered on the register on the same day, 19 May 2000.…”