How many times has (2016) 62 EHRR 32 been cited?

(2016) 62 EHRR 32 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

(2016) 62 EHRR 32

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

(2016) 62 EHRR 32

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Rashid Maqsood Abbasi & Anor v Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 2023-03-31
“…lude clear inferences and unrebutted presumptions of fact (Salman v. Turkey (App. No. 21986/93) (2002) 34 EHRR 17, [100]; Bouyid v. Belgium (App. No. 23380/09) (2016) 62 EHRR 32, [82]).…”
Cited — ASK, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-07-16
“…ocuses on the effects of the treatment on the individual. Indeed, the Strasbourg jurisprudence (exemplified by Bouyid v Belgium (ECtHR Application No 23380/09) (2016) 62 EHRR 32 (“Bouyid”) at [87], to which we were referred by Ms Weston) is to the effect that ill-treatment that attains the appropriate minimum level of severity usually …”