How many times has [2017] 3 WLR 811 been cited?

[2017] 3 WLR 811 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2017] 3 WLR 811

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2017] 3 WLR 811

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — B v The General Medical Council 2018-06-28
“…, as on others, it seems to me helpful to bear in mind the remarks of Lewison LJ in Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Co Ltd and Others [2017] EWCA Civ 121, [2017] 3 WLR 811, as to the scheme and purpose of a Subject Access Request:…”
Cited — B v The General Medical Council 2018-06-28
“…Warby J); Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 74; [2017] 1 WLR 3255, [105]-[113] (Arden LJ); Itthadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens [2017] EWCA Civ 121; [2017] 3 WLR 811, [104]-[110] (Lewison LJ); and see also the Information Commissioner’s Subject Access Code of Practice (“the purpose for which a [SAR] is made does not affect …”