- Cited — Joy Irene Dooley & Ors v Castle Trust & Management Services Limited 2022-11-30
“…These principles are now well-established and uncontroversial: see Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2017] UKSC 80; [2018] 1 WLR 192 at [7]; Ang v Reliantco Investments Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 879 (Comm); [2020] QB 582 at [4]; ING Bank NV v Banco Santander SA [2020] EWHC 3561 (Comm) at [64]; Flo…”
- Cited — Robin Stait v Cosmos Insurance Limited Cyprus 2022-11-01
“…s claimant to establish a “good arguable case” that he was domiciled in England and Wales at the material time, relying on Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2018] 1 WLR 192, per Lord Sumption JSC at [7].…”
- Cited — Koza Ltd & Anor. v Koza Altin Işletmeleri AS 2022-10-07
“…[2018] 1 WLR 192…”
- Cited — Amir Soleymani v Nifty Gateway LLC 2022-10-06
“…isfactory principles governing the place of acceptance of offers which were criticised by Lord Sumption in Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc. [2017] UKSC 80 [2018] 1 WLR 192 at [16]. Paragraph (6)(a) is to be amended, however, by the 149th Update on Amendments to Practice Directions of 11 July 2022, to take effect on 1 October 2022…”
- Cited — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoryevich Guriev 2022-09-30
“…As he pointed out in Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2017] UKSC 80, [2018] 1 WLR 192 at [31]:…”
- Considered — FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie 2020-07-29
“…he point considered in the very full obiter dicta of the Supreme Court in its decision in this very case: now reported as Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc. [2018] 1 WLR 192 (“Brownlie 1”). As already mentioned, the majority of the judges found that the claims did satisfy the requirement of the “gateway”; the minority found that th…”
- Cited — FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie 2020-07-29
“…Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2017] UKSC 80, [2018] 1 WLR 192 (“Brownlie I”) indicates, there are strong arguments on each side of the issue. Given that (i) the views expressed in the Supreme Court were all obiter, (ii) t…”
- Explained — Airbus S.A.S. v Generali Italia S.P.A. & Ors 2019-05-14
“…se” as explained in Bols Distilleries BV v Superior Yacht Services Ltd [2006] UKPC 45, [2007] 1 WLR 12 and Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2017] UKSC 80, [2018] 1 WLR 192.…”
- Followed — Kaefer Aislamientos SA De CV v AMS Drilling Mexico SA De CV & Ors 2019-01-17
“…the traditional test has been whether the claimant had “the better of the argument” on the facts going to jurisdiction. In Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2018] 1 WLR 192, para 7, this court reformulated the effect of that test as follows:…”
- Cited — C (Children) (Abduction: Article 13 (B)) 2018-12-20
“…In the first of these cases, the Supreme Court held in Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2017] UKSC 80, [2018] 1 WLR 192 at [7]:…”
- Cited — Aspen Underwriting Ltd & Ors v Credit Europe Bank NV 2018-11-21
“…(1) Introduction: This Issue goes to whether observations in the Supreme Court in Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2017] UKSC 80; [2018] 1 WLR 192, postdating the judgment, have changed the relevant test, so that the Judge’s approach to various of the Issues in the case must now be regarded as erroneous.…”
- Explained — Eurasia Sports Ltd v Aguad 2018-07-24
“…spute: see Altimo Holdings v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7; [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [71] as explained in Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2017] UKSC 80; [2018] 1 WLR 192 at [7]. Each of those requirements remains in issue between the claimant and Mr Mahchi Aguad on this appeal.…”
- Explained — Al Jaber & Anor v Al Ibrahim & Anor 2018-07-18
“… PD6B §3.1. What this involves was explained by Lord Sumption JSC (with whom Lady Hale PSC and Lord Hughes JSC agreed) in Brownlie v. Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2018] 1 WLR 192 at [7]:…”
- Cited — Orexim Trading Ltd v Mahavir Port And Terminal Private Ltd & Ano 2018-07-13
“…As he pointed out in Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2017] UKSC 80, [2018] 1 WLR 192 at [31]:…”
- Cited — Garcia v Marex Financial Ltd 2018-06-26
“…814, submitting that the ratio of that case was still binding on this Court, notwithstanding obiter dicta to the contrary in the Supreme Court ([2017] UKSC 80; [2018] 1 WLR 192).…”