How many times has [2018] 1 WLR 3039 been cited?

[2018] 1 WLR 3039 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2018] 1 WLR 3039

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2018] 1 WLR 3039

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — William Archer v The Commissioners For His Majesty’s Revenue And Customs 2023-06-07
“… effect. In R (Rowe and others) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; R (Vital Nut Co Ltd and Another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] EWCA Civ 2105; [2018] 1 WLR 3039 Arden LJ said that the APN legislation was designed to deprive taxpayers of the benefit of statutory provisions on self-assessment which are “normally” availab…”
Cited — Beadle v HM Revenue and Customs 2020-04-29
“…[2017] EWCA Civ 2105, [2018] 1 WLR 3039, Arden LJ at…”
Cited — Archer, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs 2019-06-18
“…judgment of this court in the cases of R (Rowe) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners, and R (Vital Nut) v Revenue andCustoms Commissioners [2017] EWCA Civ 2105, [2018] 1 WLR 3039 (“Rowe”), at…”