How many times has [2019] BCC 96 been cited?

[2019] BCC 96 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2019] BCC 96

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2019] BCC 96

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Vale SA v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor 2023-11-24
“…rth Investments Ltd [2014] UKSC 41, [2014] 1 WLR 2600; Elliston v Glencore Services (UK) Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 407; JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2018] EWCA Civ 1176, [2019] BCC 96; Staechelin v ACLBDD Holdings Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 817, [2019] 3 All ER 429 and Perry v Raleys Solicitors [2019] UKSC 5, [2020] AC 352.”…”
Cited — Gabriele Volpi & Anor. v Matteo Volpi 2022-04-05
“…rth Investments Ltd [2014] UKSC 41, [2014] 1 WLR 2600; Elliston v Glencore Services (UK) Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 407; JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2018] EWCA Civ 1176, [2019] BCC 96; Staechelin v ACLBDD Holdings Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 817, [2019] 3 All ER 429 and Perry v Raleys Solicitors [2019] UKSC 5, [2020] AC 352.…”
Cited — Revenue And Customs v Development Securities Plc & Ors 2020-12-15
“…if made on the basis of inference. In that connection, it is relevant to quote from the judgment of Leggatt LJ in JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2018] EWCA Civ 1176, [2019] BCC 96. Leggatt LJ observed in paragraph 40:…”