- Cited — EasyGroup Limited v Nuclei Limited & Ors 2023-10-27
“…lved a multi-factorial evaluation, this Court can only intervene if she erred in law or in principle: compare Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge) and see Re Sprintroom Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 932, [2019] BCC 1031 at [72]-[78] (McCombe, Leggatt and Rose LJJ). easyGroup contends that …”
- Cited — Darty Holdings SAS v Geoffrey Carton-Kelly 2023-10-09
“…to question whether the question of obviousness is one of inference, rather than an evaluative judgment: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v Icos Corpn [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78] to [81]. Moreover, Benmax was a case decided at a time when all appeals were appeals “by way of rehearing”. But in my opinion the approach of an appeal…”
- Cited — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited & Anor v Astellas Pharma Inc 2023-07-25
“… is not justified in intervening in the absence of an error of law or principle on the part of the judge: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge). This accords with the general approach of this Court to appeals against evaluative decisions: see Re Sprintroom Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ …”
- Cited — Advanced Bionics AG & Anor v Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH 2023-06-09
“… is not justified in intervening in the absence of an error of law or principle on the part of the judge: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge). This accords with the general approach of this Court to appeals against evaluative decisions: see Re Sprintroom Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ …”
- Cited — Sandoz Limited v Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company 2023-05-04
“… that this Court is only justified in intervening if the judge has made an error of law or principle: compare Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge) and see Re Sprintroom Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 932, [2019] BCC 1031 at [72]-[78] (McCombe, Leggatt and Rose LJJ). Counsel for BMS sought t…”
- Cited — Match Group, LLC & Ors. v Muzmatch Limited & Anor. 2023-04-27
“…olved a multi-factorial evaluation, this Court can only intervene if he erred in law or in principle: compare Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge) and see Re Sprintroom Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 932, [2019] BCC 1031 at [72]-[78] (McCombe, Leggatt and Rose LJJ). The Defendants have perm…”
- Cited — Optis Cellular Technology LLC & Ors v Apple Retail U.K. Limited & Ors 2023-04-25
“… is not justified in intervening in the absence of an error of law or principle on the part of the judge: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge). This accords with the general approach of this Court to appeals against evaluative decisions: see Re Sprintroom Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ …”
- Cited — IPCOM GmbH & Co Kg v Vodafone Group Plc & ors 2021-02-19
“… is not justified in intervening in the absence of an error of law or principle on the part of the judge: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge). If a court concludes that an allegation of obviousness involves hindsight, the court should reject the allegation, since the questio…”
- Cited — E Mishan & Sons, Inc v Hozelock Ltd & Ors 2020-07-08
“… is not justified in intervening in the absence of an error of law or principle on the part of the judge: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge).…”
- Cited — L'Oreal (UK) Ltd & Anor v Liqwd Inc & Anor 2019-11-18
“…There is no dispute as to the law concerning obviousness, which was recently reviewed by the Supreme Court in Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318. Nor is there any dispute that obviousness involves a multi-factorial evaluation and therefore this Court is not justified in intervening in the absence of an …”