- Cited — EasyGroup Limited v Nuclei Limited & Ors 2023-10-27
“…f confusion involved a multi-factorial evaluation, this Court can only intervene if she erred in law or in principle: compare Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge) and see Re Sprintroom Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 932, [2019] BCC 1031 at [72]-[78] (McCombe, Leggatt and Rose LJJ). easy…”
- Cited — Darty Holdings SAS v Geoffrey Carton-Kelly 2023-10-09
“…ous. It is open to question whether the question of obviousness is one of inference, rather than an evaluative judgment: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v Icos Corpn [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78] to [81]. Moreover, Benmax was a case decided at a time when all appeals were appeals “by way of rehearing”. But in my opinion the a…”
- Cited — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited & Anor v Astellas Pharma Inc 2023-07-25
“…efore this Court is not justified in intervening in the absence of an error of law or principle on the part of the judge: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge). This accords with the general approach of this Court to appeals against evaluative decisions: see Re Sprintroom …”
- Cited — Advanced Bionics AG & Anor v Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH 2023-06-09
“…efore this Court is not justified in intervening in the absence of an error of law or principle on the part of the judge: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge). This accords with the general approach of this Court to appeals against evaluative decisions: see Re Sprintroom …”
- Followed — Sandoz Limited v Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company 2023-05-04
“…tion. It follows that this Court is only justified in intervening if the judge has made an error of law or principle: compare Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge) and see Re Sprintroom Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 932, [2019] BCC 1031 at [72]-[78] (McCombe, Leggatt and Rose LJJ). Coun…”
- Cited — Match Group, LLC & Ors. v Muzmatch Limited & Anor. 2023-04-27
“…t) confusion involved a multi-factorial evaluation, this Court can only intervene if he erred in law or in principle: compare Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge) and see Re Sprintroom Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 932, [2019] BCC 1031 at [72]-[78] (McCombe, Leggatt and Rose LJJ). The …”
- Cited — Optis Cellular Technology LLC & Ors v Apple Retail U.K. Limited & Ors 2023-04-25
“…efore this Court is not justified in intervening in the absence of an error of law or principle on the part of the judge: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge). This accords with the general approach of this Court to appeals against evaluative decisions: see Re Sprintroom …”
- Cited — Illumina Cambridge Limited v Latvia MGI Tech Sia 2021-12-17
“… Jacob LJ in Pozzoli SpA v BDMO SA[2007] EWCA Civ 588, [2007] FSR 37 at [23] and referred to Lord Hodge’s review of the law in Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp[2019] UKSC 15, [2019] RPC 9. He also cited a passage from the judgment of Laddie J in Inhale Therapeutic Systems Inc v Quadrant Healthcare plc[2002] RPC 21 at [47] which it …”
- Cited — IPCOM GmbH & Co Kg v Vodafone Group Plc & ors 2021-02-19
“…efore this Court is not justified in intervening in the absence of an error of law or principle on the part of the judge: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge). If a court concludes that an allegation of obviousness involves hindsight, the court should reject the allegatio…”
- Cited — E Mishan & Sons, Inc v Hozelock Ltd & Ors 2020-07-08
“…efore this Court is not justified in intervening in the absence of an error of law or principle on the part of the judge: see Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318 at [78]-[81] (Lord Hodge).…”
- Explained — Mexichem UK Ltd v Honeywell International Inc 2020-04-01
“…nd consider whether any of them individually, and in the end cumulatively, is obvious. Thus, in Actavis Group PTC EHF and others v ICOS Corporation and another [2019] UKSC 15, Lord Hodge explained at [72] that notwithstanding the warnings against step-by-step analysis:…”
- Cited — L'Oreal (UK) Ltd & Anor v Liqwd Inc & Anor 2019-11-18
“…There is no dispute as to the law concerning obviousness, which was recently reviewed by the Supreme Court in Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corp [2019] UKSC 15, [2019] Bus LR 1318. Nor is there any dispute that obviousness involves a multi-factorial evaluation and therefore this Court is not justified in intervening i…”