“…he parties” on the permission to appeal (PTA) form read: “[w]hen the judgment(s) of the Supreme Court [from the Court of Appeal’s decision in Marex v Sevilleja [2019] QB 173 (Marex CA)] have been handed down, the matter is to be referred back to me [the judge] for further directions. As will be apparent from the Reasons, the grant …”
“… claim made by a party who was an exshareholder in the company at the time of the claim, distinguishing my judgment in the Court of Appeal in Marex v Sevilleja [2019] QB 173. As the judge noted, the Supreme Court had heard the appeal in Marex, but judgment was awaited. The judge also held at [27] that UCP’s claim as ex-shareholder …”
“…“On the basis of the law as it stands set out in my judgment in Marex v Sevilleja [2019] QB 173, it is arguable that the judge erred in not concluding that UCP was precluded from recovery by the reflective loss principle. Whether my judgment does correctl…”