- Considered — Farid el Diwany v Solicitors Regulation Authority 2023-07-26
“…The circumstances in which an appeal may be reopened under what is now CPR Part 52.30 were first established in Taylor v. Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2003] QB 528 and have most recently been considered by this court in Municipio de Mariana v. BHP Group plc [2021] EWCA Civ 1156, [2022] 1 WLR 919 (Municipio de Mariana) and…”
- Cited — C7 v Secrtary of State for the Home Department 2023-03-13
“…ciples as the power which the F-tT has in appeals which have not been certified. An alternative approach, consistent with Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90; [2003] QB 528, would be that a power to award costs is to be exercised in exceptional cases in which the exercise of such a power is necessary to avoid injustice. It was cle…”
- Considered — Vodafone Group Plc & Ors v IPCom GmbH & Co KG 2023-02-10
“…The origins of CPR rule 52.30 begin with the decision of this court in Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2003] QB 528. In the course of the judgment at [46] to [48] the court considered the question of a possible appeal to the House of Lords. They pointed out that in some case…”
- Explained — Helios Oryx Limited v Trustco Group Holdings Limited 2022-02-25
“… is headed “Reopening of final appeals”. Its purpose is to regulate the exercise of the power identified and explained in Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2003] QB 528, where the Court of Appeal held that it has an implicit jurisdiction to reopen an appeal even after it has been finally determined. This is a truly exceptional…”
- Cited — Ceredigion Recycling & Furniture Team v Pope 2022-01-14
“…[2003] QB 528…”
- Cited — Ceredigion Recycling & Furniture Team v Pope 2022-01-14
“…nly be made under CPR 52.30. The “implicit” or “residual” jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal to correct injustice recognised by this Court in Taylor v Lawrence[2003] QB 528 was subsumed into what was rule 52.17 (now 52.30) which, as the note in the White Book at 52.30.1 states, was the procedure formulated by the Civil Procedure R…”
- Cited — Ceredigion Recycling & Furniture Team v Pope 2022-01-14
“…in one of those cases, Mariana. Having set out the provisions of 52.30 and noted that 52.30 (previously 52.17) gives effect to the decision in Taylor v Lawrence[2003] QB 528, the Court stated at [59] that the most useful review since Taylor v Lawrence was in Goring on Thames [10]-[15] which the Court then quoted in full which I wil…”
- Cited — Ceredigion Recycling & Furniture Team v Pope 2022-01-14
“…[2003] QB 528…”
- Cited — Nectrus Ltd v UCP PLC 2021-01-21
“…Mr Butler QC relied upon two passages in the judgment of Lord Woolf MR in Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90; [2003] QB 528 itself. First, [26]:…”
- Cited — Akram, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2020-08-12
“…hed in the same way as the reopening of a final judgment after full argument, in accordance with the principles set out in Taylor vLawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90; [2003] QB 528 and, more recently, in Lawal vCircle 33 Housing Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1514; [2015] HLR 9 at [65], R (Goringon-Thames Parish Council) v South Oxfordshire Distri…”
- Cited — Sartipy (aka Hamila Sartipy) v Tigris Industries Inc 2019-03-01
“…At the hearing Mr Langroody sought permission pursuant to the Taylor v Lawrence jurisdiction [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2003] QB 528 now set out in CPR 52.30 to reopen one of the grounds of appeal for which Newey LJ had refused permission. This was that Henry Carr J ought to have recused him…”
- Cited — Goring-On-Thames Parish Council, R (on the application of) v South Oxfordshire District Council & Anor 2018-04-25
“…he appeal on others and the extent to which the complaining party is the author of his own misfortune will also be important considerations”: Taylor v Lawrence [2003] QB 528, para 55. Earlier we stated that the Taylor v Lawrence jurisdiction can only be properly invoked where it is demonstrated that the integrity of the earlier lit…”
- Cited — Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd & Ors 2018-04-19
“…The judgments of the Court of Appeal in Locabail (UK) Ltd v Bayfield Properties Ltd [2000] QB 451 and Taylor v Lawrence [2003] QB 528 are to similar effect.…”