How many times has [2019] QB 285 been cited?

[2019] QB 285 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2019] QB 285

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2019] QB 285

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Considered · 1

Cited — The Good Law Project, R (on the application of) v The Prime Minister & Ors 2022-12-01
“…ns where courts: (1) determine whether parts of certain policies have been lawfully made by the executive, see R (DSD) v. Parole Board [2018] EWHC 694 (Admin), [2019] QB 285 at [197]-[200]; (2) interpret the true meaning of the policy (see R (SK (Zimbabwe)) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 23, [2011] 1 WLR …”
Cited — Hoareau & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs 2020-07-30
“…e decision maker might be best placed to make the assessment is not a bar to a finding of irrationality: compare R(DSD) v Parole Board [2018] EWHC 694 (Admin); [2019] QB 285.…”
Considered — Badmus & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2020-05-20
“…The Judge referred to and considered R (DSD) v Parole Board [2018] EWHC 694 (Admin), [2019] QB 285; R (Cukurova Financial International Ltd) v HM Treasury [2008] EWHC 2567 (Admin); and R (TN (Vietnam)) v SSHD [2018] EWCA Civ 2838, [2019] 1 WLR 2647. He accep…”