- Cited — Simon Blake & Ors v Laurence Fox 2023-08-25
“… fuller account of the principles governing the determination of meaning, are all to be found in Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB),[2020] 4 WLR 25 [12] (Nicklin J), Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17,[2020] AC 393 and Millett v Corbyn [2021] EWCA Civ 567, [2021] EMLR 19 [8]-[9]. The words I have quoted are …”
- Cited — Dyson Technology Limited v Channel Four Television Corporation 2023-07-25
“…r in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17; [2020] AC 593 at paragraphs 35 to 38 and by Nicklin J in Koutsogiannis v Random House Group Limited [2019] EHWC 48 (QB); [2020] 4 WLR 25 at paragraphs 11 and 12. It is also established that any court interfering with findings made by a judge on meaning, and we would say identification or referen…”
- Applied — Rachel Riley v Laura Murray 2022-08-11
“…ant. Nicklin J applied the well-established and uncontroversial principles he had summarised in Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB), [2020] 4 WLR 25 [11]-[16]. An important aspect of these for present purposes is the “single meaning rule” explained in Koutsogiannis [11]:-…”
- Applied — Corbyn v Millett 2021-04-20
“…iewer. For that purpose, the Court applies long-established principles conveniently distilled in Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB) [2020] 4 WLR 25 [12] (Nicklin J). The practice is to read or watch the offending publication to capture an initial reaction, before reading or hearing argument. That has been …”