- Cited — Simon Blake & Ors v Laurence Fox 2023-08-25
“…rmination of meaning, are all to be found in Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB),[2020] 4 WLR 25 [12] (Nicklin J), Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17,[2020] AC 393 and Millett v Corbyn [2021] EWCA Civ 567, [2021] EMLR 19 [8]-[9]. The words I have quoted are from Stocker [43]-[44] (Lord Kerr, with whom the ot…”
- Cited — Dyson Technology Limited v Channel Four Television Corporation 2023-07-25
“… and ears of a hypothetical reasonable reader or viewer. The qualities of this person are well-established. They were set out by Lord Kerr in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17; [2020] AC 593 at paragraphs 35 to 38 and by Nicklin J in Koutsogiannis v Random House Group Limited [2019] EHWC 48 (QB); [2020] 4 WLR 25 at paragraphs 11 and …”
- Cited — Rachel Riley v Laura Murray 2022-08-11
“…g court will be slow to interfere with a judicial determination of the single meaning conveyed by words that are complained of as defamatory: Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17, [2020] AC 593 [58]-[59]. I would take the same approach to findings of fact about the range of meanings that could reasonably be drawn from a published statem…”
- Applied — Butt v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-06-06
“… the judge applied them wrongly. Nonetheless it is helpful to refer briefly to the legal framework, and to a decision of the Supreme Court in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17, handed down after we heard argument in this appeal.…”
- Cited — Tinkler v Ferguson & Ors 2019-05-15
“…In the light of Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17, [2019] 2 WLR 1033, handed down by the Supreme Court on the day on which we heard the argument in this appeal, there was no essential dispute on the relevant l…”