How many times has [2020] Env. L.R. 3 been cited?

[2020] Env. L.R. 3 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2020] Env. L.R. 3

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2020] Env. L.R. 3

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — R. (on the application of Sarah Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council 2022-02-17
“…the impacts of the construction works; and the first instance judgment in R. (on the application of Preston) v Cumbria County Council [2019] EWHC 1362 (Admin); [2020] Env. L.R. 3, at paragraphs 46 to 49, holding that the assessment for a proposed temporary discharge pipe for a wastewater treatment plant must include not only the effects…”
Cited — R. (on the application of Sarah Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council 2022-02-17
“…f an improved urban ring road (Ecologistas) or of a discharge pipe (as in R. (on the application of Preston) v Cumbria County Council [2019] EWHC 1362 (Admin); [2020] Env. L.R. 3).…”