How many times has [2021] 1 WLR 5132 been cited?

[2021] 1 WLR 5132 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2021] 1 WLR 5132

· cited by 2 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2021] 1 WLR 5132

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 2

Considered — Owen Tabbitt v Thomas Clark 2023-06-28
“…In Adelekun v Ho [2021] UKSC 43, [2021] 1 WLR 5132 the Supreme Court considered the operation of QOCS. The actual decision of the court was that where a defendant has a costs order in his favour, that costs ord…”
Considered — Excalibur & Keswick Groundworks Ltd v Michael McDonald 2023-01-17
“…In Adelekun v Ho [2021] 1 WLR 5132 the Supreme Court (paras 1 to 5) considered the QOCS regime and stated:…”