How many times has [2022] 2 FLR 1012 been cited?

[2022] 2 FLR 1012 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2022] 2 FLR 1012

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2022] 2 FLR 1012

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Followed · 1Cited · 1

Followed — J (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) 2023-04-28
“…I mention this because it has been necessary on this appeal to consider a first-instance decision – RL v Nottinghamshire County Council [2022] EWFC 13, [2022] 2 FLR 1012, [2022] 4 WLR 103 – that takes a different approach. That decision should not be followed for reasons given at the end of this judgment.…”
Cited — J (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) 2023-04-28
“…changes the aspect of the case and which could not with reasonable diligence have been ascertained before”: Mostyn J in RL v Nottinghamshire CC [2022] EWFC 13, [2022] 2 FLR 1012, [43].…”