How many times has Case C-173/11 been cited?

Case C-173/11 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

Case C-173/11

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Case C-173/11

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Applied · 1

Cited — Lifestyle Equities CV & Anor. v Amazon UK Services Limited & Ors. 2022-05-04
“…hat State or at the EU: see Case C-324/09 L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG [2011] ECR I-6011 (trade marks), Case 5-/11 Donner [EU:C:2012:370] (copyright) and Case C-173/11Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar GmbH [EU:C:2012:642] (database right).…”
Applied — Tunein Inc v Warner Music UK Ltd & Anor 2021-03-26
“…targeted at that State: see Case C-324/09 L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG [2011] ECR I-6011 (trade marks), Case 5-/11 Donner [EU:C:2012:370] (copyright) and Case C-173/11Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar GmbH [EU:C:2012:642] (database right). This case law has been applied in this jurisdiction to communication to the public: EMI …”
Cited — Argos Ltd v Argos Systems Inc 2018-10-09
“…Thus, in Case C-173/11 Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar GmbH [2013] FSR 4, in the context of re-utilisation of data from a database protected by the sui generis right under Directive…”