How many times has Case C-355/14 been cited?

Case C-355/14 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

Case C-355/14

· cited by 3 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Case C-355/14

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Dawson's (Wales) Ltd v The Commissioners for HMRC 2023-03-28
“…In Polihim SS EOOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Svishtov, Case C-355/14 [2016] ECLI: EU: C: 2016: 403 the issue before the CJEU was whether a sale by the owner of excise goods held in an authorised tax warehouse to a purchaser who …”
Cited — General Transport Service SPA v Revenue And Customs 2020-03-18
“…(Case C-355/14) in this regard. We agree that ‘consumption’ is a central concept in EU law relating to excise duty……”
Cited — Seabrook Warehousing Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Revenue And Customs 2019-07-29
“…support of its judicial review claim, and as a matter of binding authority, based on the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“the CJEU”) in Case C-355/14, “Polihim-SS” EOODv Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Svishtov (“Polihim”), in which judgment was delivered on 2 June 2016 on a reference for a preliminary ruling from the…”