How many times has Case C-37/95 been cited?

Case C-37/95 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

Case C-37/95

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Case C-37/95

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Revenue And Customs v Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust 2020-07-10
“…iginally argued that the making of a supply is not a precondition of economic activity. He supported that argument by reference to the decision of the CJEU in (Case C-37/95) Belgium v Ghent Coal Terminal NV [1998] STC 260. Ghent Coal Terminal had bought land for the purposes of its business; and carried out improvement works. But …”
Cited — The Commissioners for HMRC v University of Cambridge 2018-03-27
“…eir purpose or results, provided that they are themselves subject in principle to VAT (see, to that effect, Case 268/83 Rompelman [1985] ECR 655, paragraph 19; Case C-37/95 Ghent Coal Terminal [1998] ECR 1-1, paragraph 15; Gabalfrisa and Others, paragraph 44; Midland Bank, paragraph 19, and Abbey National, paragraph 24).…”