How many times has LR 10 Ch App 515 been cited?

LR 10 Ch App 515 is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

LR 10 Ch App 515

· cited by 4 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

LR 10 Ch App 515

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 4

Cited — Wood v Commercial First Business Ltd & Ors 2021-03-31
“…Among the most important of these authorities is Panama and South Pacific Telegraph Co v India Rubber, Gutta Percha, and Telegraph Works Co (1875) LR 10 Ch App 515 (Panama Telegraph). The plaintiff company (the Panama Company) was formed and promoted by the defendant company (the Telegraph Works Company) to make and lay a…”
Cited — Wood v Commercial First Business Ltd & Ors 2021-03-31
“…Telegraph Works Co (1875) LR 10 Ch App 515, 527, 532533.”…”
Cited — Medsted Associates Ltd v Canaccord Genuity Wealth (International) Ltd 2019-02-06
“…al who can rescind it provided counter-restitution can be made: Panama and South Pacific Telegraph Co v IndiaRubber, Gutta Percha and Telegraph Works Co (1875) LR 10 Ch App 515, 527, 532-533.…”
Cited — Eze v Conway & Anor 2019-02-06
“…terise a relationship as one of agency, is not necessarily enough to engage the law of bribes. In Panama and South Pacific Telegraph Co v India Rubber (1874-5) LR 10 Ch App 515, for example, agency and the necessary fiduciary duties with regard to the particular transaction were coterminous and therefore, it was unnecessary to use the…”