- Cited — Lloyd Dorian Williams v Gerwyn Lloyd Williams & Ors 2023-11-23
“…As Mr Adams himself accepted, r 52.30 is a codification of the jurisprudence of this Court starting with Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90, in which the Court held that in exceptional circumstances the Court can re-open an appeal that has been determined. But as numerous decisions of this Court co…”
- Considered — Farid el Diwany v Solicitors Regulation Authority 2023-07-26
“…The circumstances in which an appeal may be reopened under what is now CPR Part 52.30 were first established in Taylor v. Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2003] QB 528 and have most recently been considered by this court in Municipio de Mariana v. BHP Group plc [2021] EWCA Civ 1156, [2022] 1 WLR 919 (Municipio …”
- Cited — C7 v Secrtary of State for the Home Department 2023-03-13
“…sed on the same principles as the power which the F-tT has in appeals which have not been certified. An alternative approach, consistent with Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90; [2003] QB 528, would be that a power to award costs is to be exercised in exceptional cases in which the exercise of such a power is necessary to avoid injust…”
- Considered — Vodafone Group Plc & Ors v IPCom GmbH & Co KG 2023-02-10
“…The origins of CPR rule 52.30 begin with the decision of this court in Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2003] QB 528. In the course of the judgment at [46] to [48] the court considered the question of a possible appeal to the House of Lords. They pointed out th…”
- Explained — Helios Oryx Limited v Trustco Group Holdings Limited 2022-02-25
“…That rule is headed “Reopening of final appeals”. Its purpose is to regulate the exercise of the power identified and explained in Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2003] QB 528, where the Court of Appeal held that it has an implicit jurisdiction to reopen an appeal even after it has been finally determined. This is a tr…”
- Cited — Nectrus Ltd v UCP PLC 2021-01-21
“…Mr Butler QC relied upon two passages in the judgment of Lord Woolf MR in Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90; [2003] QB 528 itself. First, [26]:…”
- Cited — Wingfield, R (on the application of) v Canterbury City Council & Anor 2020-11-27
“…The modest inroads into the principle of finality represented by CPR 52.30 have their origins in Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2002] 2 All ER 353. The case concerned allegedbias on the part of the judge by reference to events which were unknown to the parties until after the dismissa…”
- Cited — Akram, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2020-08-12
“…an appeal is approached in the same way as the reopening of a final judgment after full argument, in accordance with the principles set out in Taylor vLawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90; [2003] QB 528 and, more recently, in Lawal vCircle 33 Housing Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1514; [2015] HLR 9 at [65], R (Goringon-Thames Parish Council) v South Oxf…”
- Cited — Ullah v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-04-03
“…Moses J also cited Taylor v Lawrence [2002] EWCA Civ 90 in a passage of Lord Woolf CJ’s judgment in that case emphasising the importance of finality in litigation and said that the principles were no different in im…”
- Cited — Sartipy (aka Hamila Sartipy) v Tigris Industries Inc 2019-03-01
“…At the hearing Mr Langroody sought permission pursuant to the Taylor v Lawrence jurisdiction [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2003] QB 528 now set out in CPR 52.30 to reopen one of the grounds of appeal for which Newey LJ had refused permission. This was that Henry Carr J ought to h…”
- Cited — Goring-On-Thames Parish Council, R (on the application of) v South Oxfordshire District Council & Anor 2018-04-25
“…[2002] EWCA Civ 90]…”