How many times has [2003] EWCA Civ 1368 been cited?

[2003] EWCA Civ 1368 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] EWCA Civ 1368

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 1Cited · 1

Cited — Waltham Forest London Borough Council v Nasim Hussain & Ors 2023-06-26
“…ppeal, to something much closer to a review of the decision under appeal. See the discussion of that range by May LJ in E I Dupont de Nemours & Co v S T Dupont [2003] EWCA Civ 1368, [2006] 1 WLR 2793 at [84]–[98].…”
Considered — Cuciurean v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor 2021-03-16
“…ge could have reached”: Haringey LBC v Ahmed [2017] EWCA Civ 1861 [31]. The approach to be taken is discussed in Dupont de Nemours (EI) & Co v ST Dupont (Note) [2003] EWCA Civ 1368 [2006] 1 WLR 2793 [94]. It will always be relevant to consider the extent to which the trial judge had an advantage by virtue of seeing and hearing witnesses g…”