How many times has [2005] EWCA Civ 340 been cited?

[2005] EWCA Civ 340 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2005] EWCA Civ 340

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2005] EWCA Civ 340

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Considered · 1

Cited — Lemari Minott v Cambridge City Council 2022-02-18
“…hat is, the approach in Reg. v Harrow LBC Ex p Fahia[1998] 1 WLR 1396 which was interpreted by Neuberger LJ (as he then was) in Rikha Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2005] EWCA Civ 340 at [39] to mean that the “only relevant basis upon which a purported subsequent application may be treated as no application, according to Fahiaat 1402D appear…”
Considered — Lemari Minott v Cambridge City Council 2022-02-18
“…This court considered Fahia in Rikha Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC[2005] EWCA Civ 340, [2005] 1 WLR 2103. At [38] Neuberger LJ confirmed that Fahia had rejected a test of “material change of circumstances.” At [39] he said:…”