- Cited — David Bacci & Ors v Matthew Green 2022-10-25
“…conferred by section 37(1) of the 1981 Act are subject to constraints is confirmed elsewhere. In Masri v Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Ltd (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 303, [2009] QB 450 (“Masri”), Lawrence Collins LJ disavowed at paragraph 175 any suggestion that section 37(1) was to be taken as conferring an unfettered power, q…”
- Cited — SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd 2020-05-12
“…These principles were affirmed in Masri v Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Ltd (No. 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 303, [2009] QB 450. The claimant obtained judgment in English proceedings against defendants who had submitted to the jurisdiction of the English court and defende…”
- Cited — Behbehani v Behbehani 2019-12-20
“…The judge then cited passages from the judgment of Lawrence Collins LJ in Masri vConsolidated Contractors International UK Ltd (No.2) [2008] EWCA Civ 303 (“Masri (No.2)”) to which she had been referred by counsel on behalf of the wife. She then concluded in these terms:…”
- Cited — Behbehani v Behbehani 2019-12-20
“…Goldstone [2011] EWCA Civ 39, JSC BTA Bankv Ablyazov (No.15) [2016] EWCA Civ 987 (“Ablyazov (No.15)”), and Masri vConsolidated Contractors International UK Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 303 (“Masri(No.2)”).…”
- Cited — JSC Commercial Bank Privatbank v Kolomoisky & Ors 2019-10-15
“…uld be given reflexive effect in an appropriate case has been recognised, albeit obiter, by this Court. Thus, in Masri v Consolidated Contractors International [2008] EWCA Civ 303, [2008] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 128 at [125], having noted that whether or not the particular provision of article 22 had reflexive effect did not arise in that case, La…”
- Cited — Jimenez, R. (On the Application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) 2019-01-31
“…ette Securities Corp [1986] 1 All ER 653 at 657, [1986] Ch 482 at 493 and Lawrence Collins LJ in Masri v Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Ltd (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 303, [2008] 2 All ER (Comm) 1099, [2009] QB 450 (at [30] and [31]). It relates to whether the court can regulate the appellants' conduct abroad. Whether a court ha…”