- Cited — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoryevich Guriev 2022-09-30
“…Earlier authority for that proposition was to be found in cases such as Ex p Blain (1879) 12 Ch D 522, 526, per James LJ, and R v Jameson [1896] 2 QB 425, 430, per Lord Russell of Killowen CJ. Later authority is plentiful: see, for example, Attorney-General for…”
- Cited — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoryevich Guriev 2022-09-30
“…intendment,’ of Parliament's legislation, to use Lord Wilberforce's expression in Clark v Oceanic Contractors Inc [1983] 2 AC 130, 152C-D. In Ex p Blain (1879) 12 Ch D 522 the question was whether the court had jurisdiction, by virtue of the Bankruptcy Act 1869, to make an adjudication of bankruptcy against a foreigner, domiciled…”
- Cited — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoryevich Guriev 2022-09-30
“… that the section did not assert jurisdiction over persons resident abroad. After citing statements of the principle of territoriality in Ex parte Blain (1879) 12 Ch D 522 and Clark v Oceanic Contractors Inc [1983] 2 AC 130 Lord Justice Dillon (with whom Sir Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson V-C and Lord Justice Lloyd agreed) continued at…”
- Cited — Jimenez, R. (On the Application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) 2019-01-31
“…and thus subjecting themselves to a UK jurisdiction unless the Act expressly or by necessary implication provided to the contrary (Re Sawers, ex p Blain (1879) 12 Ch D 522 at 526 per James LJ). That principle has evolved into a question of interpreting the particular statute (Clark (Inspector of Taxes) v Oceanic Contractors Inc […”
- Cited — Orexim Trading Ltd v Mahavir Port And Terminal Private Ltd & Ano 2018-07-13
“…on; but that in the case of peripatetic employees the question depended on where the employee was based. On the other hand, in Ex p Blain. In re Sawyers (1879) 12 Ch D 522 it was held that an English court had no power to make a bankruptcy order against a partner in a firm trading in England and which had contracted debts in Engl…”
- Cited — Orexim Trading Ltd v Mahavir Port And Terminal Private Ltd & Ano 2018-07-13
“…present the presumed intention of Parliament. What can be seen is that Parliament cannot have intended an implied limitation along the lines of Ex parte Blain, 12 Ch D 522. The expression therefore must be left to bear its literal, and natural, meaning: any person.”…”