Home › Cases › [2012] EWCA Civ 1004
[2012] EWCA Civ 1004
· cited by 3 · influence score 15 /100
Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite [2012] EWCA Civ 1004
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment Cited · 3
Citation network [2012] EWCA Civ 1004 Rana v London Borough of Ealing & J v K & Anor Nicol v Blackfriars Settlement cited by
Cited by (3) Cited — J v K & Anor 2019-01-22 “…s v Board of Governors of Churchmead Church of England School [2011] UKEAT 070810/2005 (multiple debilitating conditions); and O’Cathail v Transport for London [2012] EWCA Civ 1004, [2012] IRLR 1011 (depression). In O’Cathail Mummery LJ said in terms at para. 27 (p. 1013):…”
Cited — Nicol v Blackfriars Settlement 2018-09-27 “…[2012] EWCA Civ 1004, [2002] IRLR 1001, in which Mummery LJ himself endorsed the continued application of the…”
Cited — Rana v London Borough of Ealing & Anor 2018-09-25 “…[2012] EWCA Civ 1004, [2012] IRLR 1011, in which Mummery LJ himself endorsed the continuing application of the…”
Frequently cited alongside