How many times has [2012] EWCA Civ 24 been cited?

[2012] EWCA Civ 24 is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2012] EWCA Civ 24

· cited by 4 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2012] EWCA Civ 24

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 3Cited · 1

Considered — easyGroup Limited v Easy Live (Services) Limited & Ors 2023-12-20
“…Kitchin LJ considered this in Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 24, [2012] FSR 19:…”
Considered — EasyGroup Limited v Nuclei Limited & Ors 2023-10-27
“…consider the actual use of the sign complained of in the context in which the sign has been used: see Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 24, [2012] FSR 19at [45], [87] (Kitchin LJ).…”
Considered — Match Group, LLC & Ors. v Muzmatch Limited & Anor. 2023-04-27
“…consider the actual use of the sign complained of in the context in which the sign has been used: see Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 24, [2012] FSR 19at [45], [87] (Kitchin LJ, as he then was).…”
Cited — Argos Ltd v Argos Systems Inc 2018-10-09
“…In Specsavers International Healthcare v Asda Stores Limited [2012] EWCA Civ 24; [2012] F.S.R. 19, Kitchin LJ, after citing L’Oreal and Whirlpool reiterated that there were limits to the broad statement of principle in L’Oreal:…”