How many times has [2012] EWCA Civ 805 been cited?

[2012] EWCA Civ 805 is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2012] EWCA Civ 805

· cited by 4 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2012] EWCA Civ 805

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3Applied · 1

Cited — Zehour Chelfat v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited 2022-04-06
“…In the later case of Page v Hewetts Solicitors [2012] EWCA Civ 805; [2012] C P Rep 40, these conclusions were expanded by Lewison LJ. He said:…”
Cited — Butters & Anor v Hayes 2021-02-25
“…The same approach was taken in Page v Hewetts Solicitors [2012] EWCA Civ 805. That case concerned the correct test for summary judgment where the appellant asserted that a claim form that had been issued after the expiry of the limitati…”
Applied — Butters & Anor v Hayes 2021-02-25
“…riginal claim), and in failing appropriately to apply Court of Appeal authority in Barnes v St Helens MBC [2006] EWCA Civ 1372 and in Page v Hewetts Solicitors [2012] EWCA Civ 805 to the circumstances of this case.”…”
Cited — Croke v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor 2019-02-01
“…(see also Page v Hewetts Solicitors [2012] EWCA Civ 805 and Riniker v University College London (“The Times”, 17 April 1999)).…”