- Cited — David Sahota, R (on the application of) v Herefordshire Council 2022-12-13
“…p District Council, ex parte Fabre (2000) 80 P & CR 500, at 511 (Sullivan J), a passage cited with approval by this Court in R (Palmer) v Herefordshire Council [2016] EWCA Civ 1061, [2017] 1 WLR 411, at para. 7 (Lewison LJ). In the present case, I can see no reason to avoid drawing the reasonable inference that the planning committee did …”
- Followed — Flynn, R (On the Application Of) v The London Borough of Southwark Council & Anor 2021-05-28
“…ly be assumed that if the members have accepted such a recommendation they will have done so following the officer’s advice (see Palmer v Herefordshire Council [2016] EWCA Civ 1061, [2017] 1 W.L.R. 411, at paragraph 7; and Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1314, [2019] P.T.S.R. 1452, at paragraph 42(2)). This…”
- Applied — City & Country Bramshill Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities And Local Government & Ors 2021-03-09
“…rresponding policies in the NPPF, she failed to comply with a “principle” identified by this court in R. (on the application of Palmer) v Herefordshire Council [2016] EWCA Civ 1061, [2017] 1 W.L.R. 411 (ground 2); and fourth, whether she erred in her approach to applying development plan policies for the protection of the historic environ…”
- Cited — Oxton Farm v Harrogate Borough Council 2020-06-25
“…is a fair inference, in the absence of other evidence, that they have accepted the reasoning in the officer’s report: R (Palmer) v Herefordshire County Council [2016] EWCA Civ 1061, [2017] 1 WLR 411 at [7]. Where, on the other hand, they have rejected the officer’s advice, it may be impossible to discern the reasons for the decision. In t…”
- Cited — Bates, R (On the Application Of) v MALDON DISTRICT COUNCIL 2019-07-23
“…(Palmer v Herefordshire Council [2016] EWCA Civ 1061 at [7] per Lewison…”
- Cited — Catesby Estates Ltd v Steer 2018-07-18
“…[2016] EWCA Civ 1061 (in paragraph 5 of his judgment), “[although] the most obvious way in which the setting of a listed building might be harmed is by encroachment or visual intru…”