- Explained — Joseph Kyle v Coventry City Council 2023-11-20
“…ontext of the children’s needs; and the review decision dealt with that at length. As Lord Brown made clear in [South Buckinghamshire District Council v Porter [2004] UKHL 33, [2004] 1 WLR 1953], reasons need only address the main issues. In my judgment the reviewing officer was simply not required to explain why [the housing author…”
- Cited — City & Country Bramshill Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities And Local Government & Ors 2021-03-09
“…ies familiar with the evidence and submissions in the case (see the speech of Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood in South Bucks District Council v Porter (No.2) [2004] UKHL 33, [2004] 1 W.L.R. 1953, at paragraph 36). It will not expect every piece of evidence, every concession made in cross-examination, and every submission of counse…”
- Explained — London Borough of Bromley v Broderick 2020-11-16
“…s was in the context of the children’s needs; and the review decision dealt with that at length. As Lord Brown made clear in [South Buckinghamshire DC v Porter [2004] UKHL 33, [2004] 1 WLR 1953], reasons need only address the main issues. In my judgment the reviewing officer was simply not required to explain why [the housing author…”
- Cited — CPRE Surrey v Waverley Borough Council 2019-10-31
“…In the light of the principles to which Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood referred in South Bucks v Porter (No.2) [2004] UKHL 33 (at paragraph 36 of his speech), the inspector’s reasons were, in the judge’s view, “perfectly adequate”. The report was written for a “knowledgeable audience”…”
- Cited — Gladman Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Ors 2019-09-12
“…lear, adequate and intelligible – in accordance with the principles stated by Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood in South Bucks District Council v Porter (No.2) [2004] UKHL 33, [2004] 1 W.L.R. 1953 (at paragraph 36) – one must read the decision letter fairly as a whole, bearing in mind that it is written, principally, for the parties…”
- Cited — Bates, R (On the Application Of) v MALDON DISTRICT COUNCIL 2019-07-23
“…he basis that they are drafted for informed parties who are well aware of the issues involved and the arguments advanced (South Bucks DistrictCouncil v Porter) [2004] UKHL 33; [2004] 1 WLR 1953 at [36] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood).…”
- Cited — Alibkhiet v London Borough of Brent v City of Westminster 2018-12-06
“…As noted, the reviewing officer has a statutory duty to give reasons for the review decision. In South Bucks DC v Porter (No 2)[2004] UKHL 33, [2004] 1 WLR 1953…”
- Cited — Waterstone Estates Ltd v The Welsh Ministers 2018-07-06
“…e decision letter must give intelligible and adequate reasons as to why those issues were determined as they were (South Bucks District Council v Porter (No 2) [2004] UKHL 33; [2004] 1 WLR 1953 at [35]-[36] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, and Bloor Homes at [19(2)]).…”
- Cited — Rother District Council v Freeman-Roach 2018-03-06
“…These and many other cases were reviewed by Lord Brown in South Bucks DC v Porter (No 2) [2004] UKHL 33, [2004] 1 WLR 1953. He confirmed at [29] that the burden is on the challenger to show that the decision maker made an error of law. His well-known summary of p…”
- Cited — Thilakawardhana, R (on the application of) v Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education & Anor 2018-01-17
“…will be fact specific and the degree of particularity required will vary with the nature of the issues arising for decision. In South Bucks DC v Porter (No. 2) [2004] UKHL 33; [2004] 1 WLR 1953, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood said this, at [36]:…”