- Cited — H (A Child) (Recusal), Re 2023-07-24
“…The test for apparent bias involves a well-established two stage process summarised by Leggatt LJ in Bubbles & Wine Ltd v Lusha [2018] EWCA Civ 468, [2018] BLR 341 at paragraph 17 in these terms:…”
- Followed — H (A Child) (Recusal), Re 2023-07-24
“…In Bubbles & Wine Ltd v Lusha [2018] EWCA Civ 468, [2018] BLR 341 Leggatt LJ defined “bias” at [17] as follows:…”
- Followed — K and L (Children: Fairness of Hearing) 2023-06-20
“…Civ 834 andSerafin v Malkiewicz [2020] UKSC 23, and, regarding bias, Resolution Chemicals Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2013] EWCA Civ 1515, Bubbles & Wine Ltd v Lusha [2018] EWCA Civ 468 and Re AZ (A Child) (Recusal) [2022] EWCA Civ 911. The following points are of particular relevance to this appeal.…”
- Cited — K and L (Children: Fairness of Hearing) 2023-06-20
“…The test for apparent bias is different and involves a well-established two stage process summarised by Leggatt LJ in Bubbles & Wine Ltd v Lusha [2018] EWCA Civ 468 at paragraph 17 in these terms:…”
- Cited — UCP Plc v Nectrus Limited 2022-07-11
“…t it was entirely acceptable for a judge who had decided a case on paper to resolve a challenge to that decision (see, for example, Bubbles & Wine Ltd v. Lusha [2018] EWCA Civ 468 per Leggatt LJ at [17]-[18], Broughal v. Walsh Bros Builders Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1610 per Patten LJ at [30]-[35]). The judge was entirely capable of maintainin…”
- Cited — Re AZ (A Child) (Recusal) 2022-07-05
“…[2018] EWCA Civ 468 at [17] in these terms:…”
- Cited — Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd & Ors 2018-04-19
“…ount. We also received written submissions in relation to the recent Court of Appeal decision concerning apparent bias in Bubbles & Wine Limited v Reshat Lusha [2018] EWCA Civ 468. That was a case on its own and different facts and we did not find it to be of any real assistance.…”