How many times has [2002] UKPC 28 been cited?

[2002] UKPC 28 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2002] UKPC 28

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2002] UKPC 28

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Re AZ (A Child) (Recusal) 2022-07-05
“…[2002] UKPC 28, per Lord Steyn at paragraph 11.…”
Cited — Bubbles & Wine Ltd v Lusha 2018-03-14
“…g the case and considerations of inconvenience, cost and delay are irrelevant: Man O' War Station Ltd v Auckland City Council (formerly Waiheke County Council) [2002] UKPC 28, para 11 (Lord Steyn).…”