Hurstwood Properties (A) Ltd and others v Rossendale Borough Council and another [2021] UKSC 16

UKSC · cited by 5 · influence score 18/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Treatment

Cited · 5

Cited — The Commissioners For HMRC v Bluecrest Capital Management LP & Ors 2023-12-15
“…ed on both issues to the Supreme Court, which allowed their appeal on the interpretation of section 45(1)(b), but dismissed it on the corporate veil issue: see [2021] UKSC 16, [2022] AC 690 (“Rossendale (SC)”).…”
Cited — BCM Cayman LP & Anor v The Commissioners for HMRC 2023-10-12
“…The Court was also referred to Rossendale Borough Council v Hurstwood Properties (A) Ltd and Others [2021] UKSC 16, [2022] AC 690, a rating case in which Lord Briggs and Lord Leggatt (in a joint judgment) said this at [12] and [15]:…”
Cited — PSV 1982 Limited v Sean Anthony Edward Langdon 2022-10-12
“…rticular provision and interpret its language as far as possible in a way which best gives effect to that purpose: Hurstwood Properties (A) Ltd v Rossendale BC [2021] UKSC 16, [2021] 2 WLR 1125 at [10] and Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5, [2021] 4 All ER 209 at [70].…”
Cited — BT Group Plc & Anor. v Justin le Patourel 2022-05-06
“…[2021] UKSC 16 at paragraphs [9]-[10].…”
Cited — Dominik Kocur v Angard Staffing Solutions Limited 2022-02-17
“…ve approach adopted towards EU legislation is nowadays on a par with the approach adopted to domestic legislation (see e.g. Hurstwood Properties v Rossendale BC[2021] UKSC 16 at paragraphs [9]-[10]).…”