How many times has [2009] EWHC 657 (Ch) been cited?

[2009] EWHC 657 (Ch) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2009] EWHC 657 (Ch)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Explained · 1

Explained — JC Bamford Excavators Limited v Manitou UK Limited & Anor 2023-07-17
“…ircumstances the confidentiality arrangements adopted are typically bilateral. Vestergaard v Bestnet is an example of this, as I explained in my trial judgment [2009] EWHC 657 (Ch) at [5]-[6].…”
Cited — E Mishan & Sons, Inc v Hozelock Ltd & Ors 2020-07-08
“…ing it in any way. I think my Lord, Arnold LJ (as Arnold J) was making the same point when he said, in Vestergaard Frandsen and others v Bestnet Europe Limited [2009] EWHC 657 (Ch) at 664, albeit in the context of the value as confidential information to be attributed to a mere paper proposal:…”