How many times has [2014] EWHC 1082 (Ch) been cited?

[2014] EWHC 1082 (Ch) is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2014] EWHC 1082 (Ch)

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Approved · 2Cited · 1

Cited — Lifestyle Equities CV & Anor. v Amazon UK Services Limited & Ors. 2022-05-04
“…t to enable it to do so, is immediately to assess the damages or profits summarily: see e.g. my decision in Primary Group (UK) Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2014] EWHC 1082 (Ch), [2014] RPC 26 at [203]-[205]. The second course, if there is insufficient material which would enable the court immediately to assess the damages or profits s…”
Approved — Travel Counsellors Ltd v Trailfinders Ltd 2021-01-19
“…bligation. It is common ground that the correct test is the test that I derived from earlier authorities in Primary Group (UK) Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2014] EWHC 1082 (Ch), [2014] RPC 26 at [223], which was approved by this Court in Matalia v Warwickshire County Council [2017] EWCA Civ 991, [2017] ECC 25 at [46]:…”
Approved — The Racing Partnership Ltd & Ors v Sports Information Services Ltd 2020-10-09
“…o far as the law is concerned, neither side took issue with the test that I derived from the authorities in Primary Group (UK) Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2014] EWHC 1082 (Ch), [2014] RPC 26 at [223], which was approved by this Court in…”