How many times has [2016] EWHC 2417 (Ch) been cited?

[2016] EWHC 2417 (Ch) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2016] EWHC 2417 (Ch)

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Followed · 2

Followed — BNP Paribas SA v Trattamento Rifiuti Metropolitani SPA (Rev 1) 2019-05-07
“…xt and another meaning in another context, citing the following statement of Hildyard J in Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) (No 8) [2016] EWHC 2417 (Ch); [2017] 2 All ER 275 at [48(2)], referring to AIB Group (UK) Ltd v Martin [2001] UKHL 63; [2002] 1 WLR 94:…”
Followed — The State of the Netherlands v Deutsche Bank AG 2019-05-02
“…The parties referred to only two authorities on interpretation. It is worth citing them both relatively briefly. Hildyard J in Re Lehman Brothers (No 8) [2016] EWHC 2417 (Ch) [2017] 2 All ER (Comm) 275 (“Lehmans”) said the following at paragraph 48 in relation to the interpretation of ISDA Master Agreements:-…”