UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [2016] EWHC 3161 (Ch)
[2016] EWHC 3161 (Ch)
· cited by
2
· influence score
13
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[2016] EWHC 3161 (Ch)
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 2
Citation network
[2016] EWHC 3161 (Ch)
The Civil Aviation Authority v Jet
Serious Fraud Office (SFO) v Euras
cited by
Cited by (2)
Cited
—
The Civil Aviation Authority v Jet2.Com Ltd, R. (on the Application of)
2020-01-28
“…As Hildyard J succinctly put it in The RBS Rights Issue Litigation [2016] EWHC 3161 (Ch); [2017] 1 WLR 1991:…”
Cited
—
Serious Fraud Office (SFO) v Eurasian Natural Resources Corp. Ltd
2018-09-05
“…In [In Re RBS Rights Issue Litigation [2016] EWHC 3161 (Ch) (“RBS”)]… Hildyard J concluded … that the decision in Three Rivers (No. 5) was based on principles of general application, which … remain binding law in Englan…”
Frequently cited alongside
17 Ch D 675
2×
[1983] QB 878
2×
[1988] Ch. 317
2×
[1991] 1 WLR 607
2×
2 Ch D 644
2×
[2003] QB 1556
2×
[2004] QB 916
2×
[2003] EWHC 3028 (Comm)
2×