- Cited — Loreley Financing (Jersey) No 30 Limited v Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited & Ors 2022-11-10
“…at the object of litigation privilege was accurately described in “the classic statement” of Sir George Jessel MR in Anderson v Bank of British Columbia (1876) 2 Ch D 644, 649:…”
- Cited — The Civil Aviation Authority v Jet2.Com Ltd, R. (on the Application of) 2020-01-28
“…ure knowledge that his communications to and from the lawyer will be “kept secret” unless disclosed with his consent (Anderson v Bank of BritishColumbia (1876) 2 Ch D 644 (“Anderson”) at page 649 per Sir George Jessel MR); and that a party in adversarial proceedings had no right to have access to his opponent’s brief nor any obl…”
- Followed — BGC Brokers LP & Ors v Tradition (UK) Ltd & Ors 2019-11-18
“…The rationale for this rule was explained by James LJ in Anderson v British Bank of Columbia (1875-76) LR 2 Ch D 644 at 676 as follows:…”
- Cited — Addlesee & Ors v Dentons Europe LLP 2019-10-02
“…hat the communications he so makes to him, should be kept secret, unless with his consent.” (Sir George Jessel MR in Anderson v Bank of British Columbia (1876) 2 Ch D 644, 649)…”
- Cited — WH Holding Ltd & Anor v E20 Stadium LLP 2018-11-30
“…Nor, in our judgment, is that a new proposition. In Anderson v Bank of British Columbia (1876) 2 Ch D 644, at 649-650, Sir George Jessel MR said:…”
- Cited — Serious Fraud Office (SFO) v Eurasian Natural Resources Corp. Ltd 2018-09-05
“…“… the passage cited from Anderson’s case (1876) 2 Ch D 644 [“Anderson”]shows that information from an employee stands in the same position as information from an independent agent. It may, moreover, be a mere matter of…”