How many times has [2020] EWHC 546 (Ch) been cited?

[2020] EWHC 546 (Ch) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2020] EWHC 546 (Ch)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Tradition Financial Services Ltd v Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors 2023-02-10
“…In Bilta (UK) Ltd v NatWest Markets Ltd [2020] EWHC 546 (Ch) Snowden J said at [186] that the statements of principle in Bank of India v Morris were “clear Court of Appeal authority” for the proposition that section 213 …”
Cited — Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors v Tradition Financial Services Ltd 2021-02-22
“…(“MTIC”) fraud. There have been numerous descriptions of MTIC fraud in reported cases: for a recent brief description see Bilta (UK) Ltd v Nat West Markets plc [2020] EWHC 546 (Ch) (a similar claim concerned with spot trading of EUAs in the same period) at [12] per Snowden J. It is not necessary for the purposes of this appeal to add yet …”