How many times has [2005] EWHC 1564 (Fam) been cited?

[2005] EWHC 1564 (Fam) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2005] EWHC 1564 (Fam)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Griffiths v Tickle & Ors 2021-12-10
“… Sir Mark Potter, P, memorably put it, the Re S approach “is not a mechanical exercise to be decided on the basis of rival generalities”: A Local Authority v W [2005] EWHC 1564 (Fam), [2006] 1 FLR 1 [53].…”
Cited — Al M (Children) 2020-02-28
“…Restrictions on publication) [2004] UKHL 47, [2005] 1 AC 593 (to which we will refer as S); A Local Authority v W [2005] EWHC 1564 (Fam), [2014] EMLR 7, [2006] 1 FLR 1 (to which we will refer as W); and Re J (A Child) [2013] EWHC 2694 (Fam). He started with Re J, as the most recent. The passage …”