How many times has [2013] EWHC 4111 (QB) been cited?

[2013] EWHC 4111 (QB) is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] EWHC 4111 (QB)

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Zayn Al-Abidin Muhammad Husayn v The Foreign and Commonwealth Office 2022-03-16
“… recognised that each case depended on its own facts. These were R (Al-Jedda) v Secretary of State for Defence[2006] EWCA Civ 327, [2007] QB 621, Belhaj v Straw[2013] EWHC 4111 (QB), [2014] EWCA Civ 1394, [2017] AC 964, Serdar Mohammed v Ministry of Defence[2014] EWHC 1369 (QB), and Rahmatullah v Ministry of Defence[2019] EWHC 3172 (QB).…”
Cited — FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie 2020-07-29
“…The third authority is Belhaj v Straw. At first instance ([2013] EWHC 4111 (QB)) Simon J stated at [140(c)]:…”
Cited — FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie 2020-07-29
“…been findings of fact which might bear on that question, and that the case should proceed in the meantime on the basis of the default rule. At first instance – [2013] EWHC 4111 (QB) – Simon J held that that approach was evasive; that it was appropriate to decide the appropriate law on the basis of the pleadings as they then stood; and that…”