- Cited — Kwok Ho Wan & Ors v UBS AG (London Branch) 2023-03-01
“…rticle 5(3) issue that the Court of Justice of the European Union (the CJEU) had held in Handelskwekerij GJ Bier BV v. Mines de Potasse d’Alsace SA Case 21/76, [1978] QB 708 (Bier) at [19] that the words “the place of the harmful event” gave a claimant an option to commence proceedings either “at the place where the damage occurred…”
- Cited — Raffaele Mincione v Gedi Gruppo Editoriale S.p.A 2022-04-29
“…Handelskwekerij G J Bier B.V. v Mines de Potasse d’Alsace S.A. (Case 21/76) [1978] QB 708 (“Mines de Potasse”) was a case about cross-border pollution. The defendant’s mining operations in France were alleged to have caused damage to the claimant’s …”
- Cited — Wright v Granath 2021-01-15
“…e where the damage occurred (if the event and damage were in different member states): Handelskwekerj GJ Bier BV v Mines de Potasse d’ Alsace SA (Case C-21/76) [1978] QB 708, para…”
- Cited — FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie 2020-07-29
“…ed in 1987 had come about to give effect to Brussels I and to a single decision on it in Handelswerkerij GJ Bier BV v Mines de Potasse d’Alsace CA (Case 21/76) [1978] QB 708 (“Bier”); see [1990] 1 QB at 437A.…”
- Cited — Aspen Underwriting Ltd & Ors v Credit Europe Bank NV 2018-11-21
“…o the meaning of the expression, “the place where the harmful event occurred”, within Art. 7(2), the CJEU, in Bier v SA Mines de Potasse d’ Alsace (Case 21/76) [1978] QB 708, at [19], decided that the plaintiff had “….an option to commence proceedings either at the place where the damage occurred or the place of the event giving ri…”