How many times has [2014] EWHC 2872 (QB) been cited?

[2014] EWHC 2872 (QB) is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2014] EWHC 2872 (QB)

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Boris Mints & Ors v PJSC National Bank Trust & Anor 2023-10-06
“…s objectively determined, having regard to all relevant indicators and aids to construction, citing the judgment of Sales J (as he then was) in Bogdanic v SSHD [2014] EWHC 2872 (QB) (“Bogdanic”) at [48].…”
Cited — Boris Mints & Ors v PJSC National Bank Trust & Anor 2023-10-06
“…ort the narrower uncertain meaning. Mr Davies KC referred to what was said by Sales J (as he then was) in Bogdanic v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 2872 (QB) at [47]-[48]:…”
Cited — The Commissioners for HMRC v Jason Wilkes 2022-12-07
“…As Sales J emphasised in Bogdanic v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 2872 (QB) (“Bogdanic”), at paragraph 41, Inco “states a principle of interpretation of a legislative instrument”. In Inco, Lord Nicholls spoke of the Court adding, omitt…”