How many times has [2017] EWHC 89 (TCC) been cited?

[2017] EWHC 89 (TCC) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2017] EWHC 89 (TCC)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Followed · 1Cited · 1

Cited — Manek & Ors v IIFL Wealth (UK) Ltd & Ors (2) 2021-05-04
“…y and caution: see Konamaneni, AK Investment CJSC v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7 at [97]and more recently, Fraser J in HRH Okpapi v Royal Dutch Shell Plc [2017] EWHC 89 (TCC) at [121].…”
Followed — Okpabi & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Anor (Rev 1) 2018-02-14
“…nuary 2017, he concluded that there was no arguable case that RDS owed the claimants a duty of care, see Okpabi and others v. Royal Dutch Shell Plc and another [2017] EWHC 89 (TCC); and, by an order of 1 February 2017, he made the following declarations:…”