How many times has [2001] UKHL 47 been cited?

[2001] UKHL 47 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2001] UKHL 47

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2001] UKHL 47

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Waltham Forest London Borough Council v Nasim Hussain & Ors 2023-06-26
“…Mr Underwood referred to the observations of Lord Hoffmann in Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman [2001] UKHL 47, [2003] 1 AC 153 at [49]:…”
Cited — Bank St Petersburg PJSC & Anor v Arkhangelsky & Anor 2020-03-18
“…st and dispassionate consideration of the balance of probabilities. It was, said the appellants, a classic misapplication of Re H (see below)and SSHD v. Rehman [2001] UKHL 47.…”
Cited — Jones v Birmingham City Council 2018-05-23
“…d before McCann as far back as In re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1996] AC 563 repeated in Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman [2001] UKHL 47 [2003] 1 AC 153 in which Lord Hoffmann observed (at [55]:…”