- Cited — City of London Police v Geldart 2021-04-28
“…estion is ―what caused the treatment in question?‖. But, as Lord Nicholls observed at para. 29 of his speech in Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] UKHL 48, [2001] ICR 1065, ―causation is a slippery word‖. Answering the causation question in this context may involve two different kinds of inquiry. In a straightfor…”
- Cited — Page v Lord Chancellor & Anor 2021-02-26
“…s the conclusion of a section in which Choudhury P sets out passages from the decision of the House of Lords in Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] UKHL 48, [2001] ICR…”
- Cited — Jesudason v Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust 2020-01-31
“…As Lord Nicholls pointed out in Chief Constable of West Yorkshire v Kahn [2001] UKHL 48; [2001] ICR 1065 para.28, in the similar context of discrimination on racial grounds, this is not strictly a causation test within the usual meaning of that te…”
- Cited — Tiplady v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council 2019-12-11
“…f Lord Hope, at paras. 31-37 (pp. 348-350). He started by referring to the earlier decision of the House in Chief Constable of the West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] UKHL 48, [2001] ICR 1065, which concerned a complaint that the employer had failed to provide the applicant with a reference on the ground of his race, contrary to sec…”
- Cited — Unite the Union v Nailard 2018-05-24
“…[2001] UKHL 48, [2001] ICR 1065, Lord Nicholls observed that “causation is a slippery word” and cautioned against its use in this context – see para. 29, at p. 1072 C-E. Cour…”