- Followed — Joy Dove v HM Assistant Coroner for Teesside and Hartlepool & Anor 2023-03-17
“…This Court must abide by the Ullah principle (R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26, [2004] 3 All ER 785) that courts should, absent some special circumstances, follow any clear and consistent jurisprudence of the Strasbourg court, to keep pac…”
- Cited — Mercer v Alternative Future Group Ltd & Anor. 2022-03-24
“…[2004] UKHL 26, [2004] 2 AC 323, and…”
- Cited — McConnell & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Registrar General for England and Wales 2020-04-29
“…ourts take under the HRA is in general to keep pace with the jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Court but not to go beyond it: see R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26; [2004] 2 AC 323, at para. 20 (Lord Bingham of Cornhill) and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26; [2008] AC 153, at paras. 105-106 (L…”
- Cited — Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery 2020-02-12
“…looking by a neighbour or a neighbour’s invitees is a breach of Article 8. The “mirror principle” articulated by Lord Bingham in R(Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26; [2004] 2 A.C. 323 (that our courts should keep pace with, but not go beyond, Strasbourg), as clarified by Lord Brown in Rabone v Pennine Care NHS Foundation T…”
- Cited — BF (Albania) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-10-25
“…ved, as this case is in fact materially indistinguishable because both cases were “foreign cases” as defined by Lord Bingham in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26; [2004] 2 AC 323 at [9], i.e. a case:…”
- Cited — AB, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice 2019-01-18
“…Ms Gallagher submits that that principle has evolved since the decision of the House of Lords in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26; [2004] 2 AC 323, which is usually taken to be the genesis of the mirror principle. In Ullah, at [20] Lord Bingham of Cornhill said:…”
- Cited — Conway, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Justice & Ors 2018-06-27
“… is proportionate as a matter of domestic law under Re G, it is required by the terms of section 2 of the HRA and cases such as R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26, [2004] 2 AC 323 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26, [2008] AC 153, to go no further than what has been decided by the ECtHR; na…”