- Cited — Joy Dove v HM Assistant Coroner for Teesside and Hartlepool & Anor 2023-03-17
“…nvestigative obligation under Article 2: R (Middleton) v West Somerset Coroner [2004] UKHL 10, [2004] 2 AC 182 and R (Hurst) v London Northern District Coroner [2007] 2 AC 189. The approach in Middleton and Hurst was given statutory effect by s 5(2) of the 2009 Act.…”
- Cited — Mercer v Alternative Future Group Ltd & Anor. 2022-03-24
“…ed section 152 does not provide a basis for declining to interpret it in that way under section 3 of the 1998 Act (R (Hurst) v London Northern District Coroner [2007] 2 AC 189, Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, Wandsworth London Borough Council v Vining [2018] ICR 499);…”
- Cited — Jazztel Plc v The Commissioners for HMRC 2022-02-25
“…pplied, or subjected to a conforming interpretation, in order to secure compliance with EU law: see R (Hurst) v London Northern District Coroner[2007] UKHL 13, [2007] 2 AC 189, at [52] and Imperial Chemical Industries plc v Colmer (No 2)[1999] 1 WLR 2035 (HL). Furthermore, say HMRC, this reasoning is consistent with the actual conclu…”
- Applied — Maguire, R (on the opplication of) v HM Senior Coroner for Blackpool & Fylde & Ors 2020-06-10
“…e question whether the article 2 procedural obligation applies. An analysis of the speeches in the House of Lords in R (Hurst) v. London North District Coroner [2007] 2 AC 189 and the judgments in Smith does not deliver a clear answer to the question whether as a matter of law there is any difference in scope between article 2 and tr…”