How many times has [2005] UKHL 56 been cited?

[2005] UKHL 56 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2005] UKHL 56

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2005] UKHL 56

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — URS Corporation Limited v BDW Trading Limited 2023-07-05
“…ng of the words used in s.135(3): see Bennion, Bailey and Norburyon Statutory Interpretation, 8th Edition, at paragraph 10.4 and R (Jackson) v Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56; [2006] 1 A.C. 262 at [29]. The amendment which, by way of s.135 of the BSA, adds the extension to the relevant limitation position “is to be treated as always…”
Cited — Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2021-02-18
“…e Unison at [76]-[79], R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 at p.131 per Lord Hoffmann and Jackson v Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56, [2006] 1 AC 262 at [159] per Lady Hale.…”