How many times has [2006] UKHL 51 been cited?

[2006] UKHL 51 is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2006] UKHL 51

· cited by 4 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2006] UKHL 51

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3Considered · 1

Considered — T (Abduction: Protective Measures: Agreement to Return), Re 2023-12-01
“…22] EWCA Civ 1171 (“Re B”); Re C (Article 13(b)) [2021] EWCA Civ 1354 (“Re C”); and the Supreme Court decisions of Re D (A Child)(Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2006] UKHL 51; [2007] 1 AC 619 (“Re D”), and Re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27; [2012] 1 AC 144 (“Re E”). I have further considered (and make refere…”
Cited — X (Child abduction: habitual residence) 2022-11-01
“…[2006] UKHL 51 (at paragraph 65), and again in…”
Cited — G (Abduction: Consent/discretion) 2021-02-09
“…[2006] UKHL 51…”
Cited — G (A Child : Child Abduction) 2020-09-15
“…[2006] UKHL 51; [2007] 1 AC 619 (“Re D”) at [48] per Baroness Hale of Richmond). Delay in return can result in the new factual situation becoming a new status quo, embedded t…”